Model comparison

GLM-5.1 vs Granite 4.0 H Small

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.6

Rank #51 Confirmed

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

35.9

Rank #213 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.1 leads 55.0 to 31.5.

Side by side

GLM-5.1 and Granite 4.0 H Small specifications
GLM-5.1Granite 4.0 H Small
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)IBM
Noometry Index47.635.9
Released2026-04-07—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4119

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 48.5 (#52), Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Coding14861247
SWE-bench Verified74.2%—
LMArena WebDev1509—
SciCode43.8%—
WeirdML57.1%—
ALE-Bench887.1—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 24.8 (#106), Granite 4.0 H Small: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 4.0 H Small
APEX-Agents40.9%—
ExploitBench18.1%—
GBAEval0%—
Vending-Bench 25,634—

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 38.2 (#57), Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Hard Prompts14721240
SimpleBench55.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)77.7%—
CritPt4.6%—
Chess Puzzles19%—
Thematic Generalization69.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.86—

Math GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 49.0 (#48), Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Math14721251
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)36.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions67.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench22.2%—
Omni-MATH—29.6%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)33.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)12.5%—

Knowledge GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#45), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Expert14771244
GPQA Diamond89.9%—
SimpleQA Verified34%—
MMLU-Pro—56.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.2%
GPQA (HELM)—38.3%

Multilingual GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 55.2 (#34), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Non-English14481216
LMArena Chinese15161250
LMArena Russian14531198
LMArena Spanish14671258
LMArena French1478—
LMArena German1466—
LMArena Japanese1436—
LMArena Korean1423—

Instruction Following GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 76.5 (#41), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Instruction Following14511221
IFEval—89%

Long Context GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#51), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Longer Query14671240

Writing & Preference GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 67.2 (#29), Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Text14621241
LMArena Creative Writing14541210
LMArena Multi-Turn14731243
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1592—
WildBench—73.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.1 better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.1 or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.5 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.1 and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.1 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper