Model comparison

GLM-5.1 vs Hy4 preview

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Hy4 preview costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.8

Rank #59 Confirmed

Hy4 preview Tencent

45.3

Rank #73 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.1 scores higher in 1 category and Hy4 preview in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5.1 leads 39.1 to 31.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 22.2% for GLM-5.1 and 75% for Hy4 preview.
  • Hy4 preview is cheaper at $0.75 / $2.25 per million input/output tokens, against $1.40 / $4.40 for GLM-5.1.
  • Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

GLM-5.1 and Hy4 preview specifications
GLM-5.1Hy4 preview
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Tencent
Noometry Index47.845.3
Released2026-04-072026-08-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window200K1.05M
Max output131K64K
Input $ / M tokens$1.40$0.75
Output $ / M tokens$4.40$2.25
Results tracked413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55), Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hy4 preview
LMArena WebDev15081632
SWE-bench Verified74.2%—
SciCode43.8%—
WeirdML57.1%—
LMArena Coding1485—
ALE-Bench887.1—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113), Hy4 preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hy4 preview
APEX-Agents40.9%—
ExploitBench18.1%—
GBAEval0%—
Vending-Bench 25,634—

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60), Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hy4 preview
NYT Connections (extended)77.7%68.2%
SimpleBench55.1%—
CritPt4.6%—
Chess Puzzles19%—
Thematic Generalization69.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1472—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.84—

Math Hy4 preview leads

GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60), Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50), Hy4 preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hy4 preview
GPQA Diamond89.9%—
SimpleQA Verified34%—
LMArena Expert1476—

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36), Hy4 preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hy4 preview
LMArena Non-English1447—
LMArena Chinese1515—
LMArena French1474—
LMArena German1465—
LMArena Japanese1434—
LMArena Korean1418—
LMArena Russian1454—
LMArena Spanish1469—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42), Hy4 preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hy4 preview
LMArena Instruction Following1451—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53), Hy4 preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hy4 preview
LMArena Longer Query1466—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31), Hy4 preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hy4 preview
LMArena Text1461—
LMArena Creative Writing1453—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1592—
LMArena Multi-Turn1472—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.1 better than Hy4 preview?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Hy4 preview costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.1 or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $2.25 per million output tokens; GLM-5.1 lists at $1.40 and $4.40.

Is GLM-5.1 or Hy4 preview better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 48.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.1 and Hy4 preview share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.1 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Hy4 preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper