Model comparison

GLM-5.1 vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.8

Rank #59 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.1 leads 54.9 to 35.1.
  • GLM-5.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5.1 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
GLM-5.1Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Tencent
Noometry Index47.838.6
Released2026-04-07—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding14851307
SWE-bench Verified74.2%—
LMArena WebDev1508—
SciCode43.8%—
WeirdML57.1%—
ALE-Bench887.1—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
APEX-Agents40.9%—
ExploitBench18.1%—
GBAEval0%—
Vending-Bench 25,634—

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts14721286
SimpleBench55.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)77.7%—
CritPt4.6%—
Chess Puzzles19%—
Thematic Generalization69.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.84—

Math GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math14731281
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)36.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions67.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench22.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)33.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)12.5%—

Knowledge GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert14761276
GPQA Diamond89.9%—
SimpleQA Verified34%—

Multilingual GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English14471265
LMArena Chinese15151346
LMArena Russian14541266
LMArena French1474—
LMArena German1465—
LMArena Japanese1434—
LMArena Korean1418—
LMArena Spanish1469—

Instruction Following GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following14511277

Long Context GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query14661341

Writing & Preference GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text14611288
LMArena Creative Writing14531264
LMArena Multi-Turn14721284
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1592—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.1 better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.1 or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.1 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.1 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper