Model comparison

GLM-5.1 vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.8

Rank #59 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.1 leads 66.9 to 31.1.

Side by side

GLM-5.1 and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct specifications
GLM-5.1Granite 3.0 8b Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)IBM
Noometry Index47.831.6
Released2026-04-07—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4114

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding14851112
SWE-bench Verified74.2%—
LMArena WebDev1508—
SciCode43.8%—
WeirdML57.1%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—35.4%
ALE-Bench887.1—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 3.0 8b Instruct
APEX-Agents40.9%—
ExploitBench18.1%—
GBAEval0%—
Vending-Bench 25,634—

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14721092
SimpleBench55.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)77.7%—
CritPt4.6%—
Chess Puzzles19%—
Thematic Generalization69.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.84—

Math GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Math14731143
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)36.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions67.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench22.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)33.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)12.5%—

Knowledge GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert14761087
GPQA Diamond89.9%—
SimpleQA Verified34%—

Multilingual GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14471037
LMArena Chinese15151063
LMArena Russian14541060
LMArena French1474—
LMArena German1465—
LMArena Japanese1434—
LMArena Korean1418—
LMArena Spanish1469—

Instruction Following GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14511088

Long Context GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14661122

Writing & Preference GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Granite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Text14611096
LMArena Creative Writing14531071
LMArena Multi-Turn14721063
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1592—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.1 better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.1 or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.1 and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.1 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper