Noometry

Model comparison

GLM-4.7 vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.7 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #124 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.7 leads 60.9 to 27.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 6% for GLM-4.7 and 0% for Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct.

Side by side

GLM-4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index42.027.9
Released2025-12-222024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.60—
Output $ / M tokens$2.20—
Results tracked3635

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding14541093
LMArena WebDev1435—
SciCode45.1%—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
ALE-Bench399.48—
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
Terminal-Bench33.4%—
Vending-Bench 22,377—

Reasoning GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
Chess Puzzles6%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14431072
SimpleBench47.7%—
CritPt1.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index143.51—
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math14231111
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202583.3%—
ProofBench6%—
LiveBench Math—15.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)2.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert14241045
GPQA Diamond83.3%—
SimpleQA Verified32.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.7%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14171021
LMArena Chinese14951021
LMArena French14321076
LMArena German14241044
LMArena Japanese1439935
LMArena Korean1399905
LMArena Russian14231022
LMArena Spanish14341085

Instruction Following GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14111053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14321044
CL-bench15.9%—
CL-bench Life10.9%—

Writing & Preference GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text14351073
LMArena Creative Writing14011037
LMArena Multi-Turn14461018
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1413—
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.7 better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.7 or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper