Noometry

Model comparison

GLM-4.7 vs Grok Build 0.1

GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.7 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #124 Confirmed

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

36.4

Rank #216 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7 scores higher in 2 categories and Grok Build 0.1 in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 24.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 1.7% for GLM-4.7 and 9.1% for Grok Build 0.1.
  • GLM-4.7 is cheaper at $0.60 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
  • Grok Build 0.1 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 205K.
  • GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-4.7Grok Build 0.1
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)xAI
Noometry Index42.036.4
Released2025-12-222026-04-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K256K
Max output131K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.60$1
Output $ / M tokens$2.20$2
Results tracked363

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79), Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Grok Build 0.1
SciCode45.1%50.2%
LMArena WebDev1435—
LMArena Coding1454—
ALE-Bench399.48—

Agentic & Tool Use GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103), Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Grok Build 0.1
Terminal-Bench33.4%—
GBAEval—2.4%
Vending-Bench 22,377—

Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads

GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164), Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Grok Build 0.1
CritPt1.7%9.1%
SimpleBench47.7%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1443—
Epoch Capabilities Index143.51—

Math Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Grok Build 0.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202583.3%—
ProofBench6%—
LMArena Math1423—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)2.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Grok Build 0.1
GPQA Diamond83.3%—
SimpleQA Verified32.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.7%—
LMArena Expert1424—

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Grok Build 0.1
LMArena Non-English1417—
LMArena Chinese1495—
LMArena French1432—
LMArena German1424—
LMArena Japanese1439—
LMArena Korean1399—
LMArena Russian1423—
LMArena Spanish1434—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Grok Build 0.1
LMArena Instruction Following1411—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Grok Build 0.1
CL-bench15.9%—
CL-bench Life10.9%—
LMArena Longer Query1432—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Grok Build 0.1
LMArena Text1435—
LMArena Creative Writing1401—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1413—
LMArena Multi-Turn1446—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.7 better than Grok Build 0.1?

GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7 or Grok Build 0.1?

GLM-4.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.

Is GLM-4.7 or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (44.0 vs 43.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok Build 0.1 does, with 256K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7 and Grok Build 0.1 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper