Model comparison

GLM-4.6V vs Yi-Lightning

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.6V Z.ai (Zhipu)

41.3

Rank #137 Confirmed

Yi-Lightning 01.AI

37.1

Rank #209 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Yi-Lightning in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-4.6V leads 40.9 to 27.4.
  • GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-4.6V and Yi-Lightning specifications
GLM-4.6VYi-Lightning
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)01.AI
Noometry Index41.337.1
Released2025-12-082024-12-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$0.90—
Results tracked1218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VYi-Lightning
LMArena Coding13901312
Aider Polyglot—12.9%

Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VYi-Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts13681302

Math Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: —, Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VYi-Lightning
LMArena Math—1300

Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VYi-Lightning
LMArena Expert13711286

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Yi-Lightning: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VYi-Lightning
LMArena Vision1164—

Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VYi-Lightning
LMArena Non-English13591269
LMArena Chinese14251320
LMArena Russian13401255
LMArena French—1305
LMArena German—1267
LMArena Japanese—1228
LMArena Korean—1192
LMArena Spanish—1315

Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VYi-Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following13521278

Long Context GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VYi-Lightning
LMArena Longer Query13581297

Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VYi-Lightning
LMArena Text13771302
LMArena Creative Writing13471280
LMArena Multi-Turn13601311

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.6V better than Yi-Lightning?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.6V or Yi-Lightning better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Yi-Lightning share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper