Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Yi-1.5-34B
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.6V leads 38.0 to 14.8.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1160 |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Yi-1.5-34B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1213 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1091 |
| LMArena French | — | 1156 |
| LMArena German | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1005 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1121 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1139 |
Long Context GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1143 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Yi-1.5-34B?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Yi-1.5-34B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.