Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Qwen3-4B
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.6V leads 27.6 to 19.2.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | — |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Qwen3-4B?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.