Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.6V leads 27.6 to 22.4.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 40.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.