Model comparison

GLM-4.6V vs Inkling-Small

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.6V Z.ai (Zhipu)

41.3

Rank #137 Confirmed

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 38.6 to 27.6.
  • GLM-4.6V is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.45 / $1.20 for Inkling-Small.
  • Inkling-Small accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

GLM-4.6V and Inkling-Small specifications
GLM-4.6VInkling-Small
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Thinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index41.346.5
Released2025-12-082026-07-15
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K524K
Max output33K1.05M
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.45
Output $ / M tokens$0.90$1.20
Results tracked1233

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VInkling-Small
LMArena Coding13901451
LMArena WebDev—1409
SciCode—48.7%

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VInkling-Small
LMArena Hard Prompts13681423
ARC-AGI-2—40.1%
ARC-AGI-1—84%
CritPt—8.3%
Chess Puzzles—18%
Mystery Game Puzzles—6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—150.15

Math Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: —, Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VInkling-Small
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—46.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—90%
ProofBench—6%
LMArena Math—1459

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VInkling-Small
LMArena Expert13711442
GPQA Diamond—88.5%
SimpleQA Verified—19.1%

Multimodal Inkling-Small leads

GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VInkling-Small
LMArena Vision11641235

Multilingual Inkling-Small leads

GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VInkling-Small
LMArena Non-English13591402
LMArena Chinese14251465
LMArena Russian13401391
LMArena French—1436
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1363
LMArena Spanish—1428

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VInkling-Small
LMArena Instruction Following13521399

Long Context Inkling-Small leads

GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VInkling-Small
LMArena Longer Query13581401

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VInkling-Small
LMArena Text13771414
LMArena Creative Writing13471331
LMArena Multi-Turn13601418
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1491

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.6V better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V or Inkling-Small?

GLM-4.6V is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Inkling-Small lists at $0.45 and $1.20.

Is GLM-4.6V or Inkling-Small better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling-Small does, with 524K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Inkling-Small share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper