Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
GLM-4.6V and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 3 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 4 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1361 |
Reasoning Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1374 |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1339 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1368 |
| LMArena French | — | 1391 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1351 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1344 |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1387 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
GLM-4.6V and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is GLM-4.6V or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 40.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.