Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.8 to 29.8.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 30.2 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1090 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 20.5% |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1073 |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1117 |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1064 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1033 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1070 |
| LMArena Russian | 1341 | 1045 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1351 | 1056 |
Long Context GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1071 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1080 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1046 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1359 | 1053 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 27.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.