Model comparison
GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.6's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-4.6 leads 40.1 to 36.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 38.4% for GLM-4.6 and 32.3% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.6.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6 | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2025-09-30 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | 262K |
| Max output | 131K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6 leads
GLM-4.6: 40.1 (#148), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 38.4% | 32.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 55.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1340 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1449 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 340.82 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.6: 32.3 (#66), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 24.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 72.4% | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.6 leads
GLM-4.6: 23.7 (#172), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.1% | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 47.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | — |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6: 39.1 (#111), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1432 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.6: 40.2 (#124), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1431 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.6: 53.5 (#66), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1499 | — |
| LMArena French | 1459 | — |
| LMArena German | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1419 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1436 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.6: 74.3 (#98), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1410 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#94), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.6: 61.1 (#90), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.6's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6 or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; GLM-4.6 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.
Is GLM-4.6 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
GLM-4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6 has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.