Model comparison

GLM-4.6 vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.6 Z.ai (Zhipu)

40.9

Rank #132 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.4

Rank #324 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6 leads 61.3 to 27.7.

Side by side

GLM-4.6 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
GLM-4.6Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index40.927.4
Released2025-09-302024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.60—
Output $ / M tokens$2.20—
Results tracked2935

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 39.9 (#137), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.1 (#319)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding14491093
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)55.4%—
LMArena WebDev1339—
SciCode38.4%—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
ALE-Bench340.82—
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-4.6: 32.1 (#60), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
Terminal-Bench24.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard72.4%—

Reasoning GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 23.1 (#168), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 13.6 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14401072
Kagi LLM Benchmark47.4%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 36.4 (#115), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 24.5 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math14311111
LiveBench Math—15.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 39.6 (#118), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.9 (#241)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert14321045
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.5%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 53.6 (#62), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.5 (#275)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14261021
LMArena Chinese15001021
LMArena French14591075
LMArena German14471044
LMArena Japanese1394935
LMArena Korean1401905
LMArena Russian14181022
LMArena Spanish14361084

Instruction Following GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 74.5 (#93), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 48.0 (#298)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14101053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#91), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#271)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14231044

Writing & Preference GLM-4.6 leads

GLM-4.6: 61.3 (#86), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.7 (#295)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text14401073
LMArena Creative Writing14111037
LMArena Multi-Turn14271018
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1411—
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.6 better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.6 or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

GLM-4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6 has 29 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper