Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 37.4.
- Both cost about the same: $0.60 input and $1.80 output per million tokens.
- Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 64K.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 64K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.78 |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1354 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Qwen3.5 Plus?
GLM-4.5V is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus lists at $0.40 and $2.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 64K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.