Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Qwen-7B
GLM-4.5V has enough public results to be ranked (#158); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Qwen-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | — |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2023-09-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 45% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.47 |
| LAMBADA | — | 67.9% |
| PIQA | — | 77.9% |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1353 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 51.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 76.4% |
| MMLU | — | 45% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Qwen-7B?
GLM-4.5V has enough public results to be ranked (#158); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Qwen-7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-7B has 8.