Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.5 to 27.1.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1028 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1089 |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 984 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1016 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1059 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1023 |
Long Context GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 996 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5V or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.