Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs o1-pro
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.5V leads 36.8 to 29.3.
- GLM-4.5V is cheaper at $0.60 / $1.80 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- o1-pro accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 64K.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | o1-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2025-03-19 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 64K | 200K |
| Max output | 16K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $150 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | $600 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118), o1-pro: 20.2 (#223)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 23.3% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | — |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1353 | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155), o1-pro: 29.3 (#227)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than o1-pro?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or o1-pro?
GLM-4.5V is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.
Which has the bigger context window?
o1-pro does, with 200K tokens against 64K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and o1-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.