Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 1 category and Muse Glimmer in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Muse Glimmer leads 50.5 to 44.6.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1396 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1417 |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1386 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5V or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (39.5 vs 40.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.