Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.5 to 48.7.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1307 |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1286 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1281 |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1276 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1266 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1277 |
Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 1341 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 1284 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5V or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.