Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 8 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.5 to 47.3.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 37.7 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1269 |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1255 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1265 |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1238 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1257 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1261 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1279 |
| LMArena French | — | 1286 |
| LMArena German | — | 1273 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1213 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1195 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1245 |
Long Context GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 1266 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 1265 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5V or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.