Model comparison

GLM-4.5V vs Granite 4.2 3b

GLM-4.5V and Granite 4.2 3b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.8 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5V Z.ai (Zhipu)

39.8

Rank #158 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 6 categories and Granite 4.2 3b in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.5 to 47.2.

Side by side

GLM-4.5V and Granite 4.2 3b specifications
GLM-4.5VGranite 4.2 3b
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)IBM
Noometry Index39.839.4
Released2025-08-11—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window64K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.60—
Output $ / M tokens$1.80—
Results tracked1511

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Coding13471361

Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads

GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Hard Prompts13341306
Kagi LLM Benchmark59.8%—

Math Not comparable

GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Math1354—

Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads

GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Expert13531315

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Vision1154—

Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads

GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Non-English13031268
LMArena Chinese13371269
LMArena Russian12981249
LMArena Spanish1336—

Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads

GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Instruction Following13111273

Long Context Too close to call

GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Longer Query13041291

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads

GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Text13331293
LMArena Creative Writing12951205
LMArena Multi-Turn13321290

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5V better than Granite 4.2 3b?

GLM-4.5V and Granite 4.2 3b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.8 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is GLM-4.5V or Granite 4.2 3b better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (39.5 vs 40.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Granite 4.2 3b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 3b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper