Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs GPT-5.2 Codex
GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.5V costs 5.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 45.4 to 38.9.
- GLM-4.5V is cheaper at $0.60 / $1.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.2 Codex.
- GPT-5.2 Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 64K.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | GPT-5.2 Codex | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 42.2 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2025-12-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 64K | 400K |
| Max output | 16K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $1.75 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | $14 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.2 Codex leads
GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152), GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.4 (#66)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 72.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1339 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 66.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,300 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: —, GPT-5.2 Codex: 40.7 (#20)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 66.5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | — |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1353 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than GPT-5.2 Codex?
GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.5V costs 5.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or GPT-5.2 Codex?
GLM-4.5V is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Codex lists at $1.75 and $14.
Is GLM-4.5V or GPT-5.2 Codex better for coding?
GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.4 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.2 Codex does, with 400K tokens against 64K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and GPT-5.2 Codex share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Codex has 5.