Model comparison

GLM-4.5 vs Yi-Lightning

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #122 Confirmed

Yi-Lightning 01.AI

37.1

Rank #209 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Yi-Lightning in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-4.5 leads 41.4 to 27.4.
  • GLM-4.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-4.5 and Yi-Lightning specifications
GLM-4.5Yi-Lightning
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)01.AI
Noometry Index42.037.1
Released2025-07-272024-12-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output98K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.60—
Output $ / M tokens$2.20—
Results tracked2718

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125), Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Yi-Lightning
LMArena Coding14341312
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)54.2%—
Aider Polyglot—12.9%
WeirdML40.6%—
ALE-Bench344.82—
AlgoTune1.52—

Reasoning GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100), Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Yi-Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts14291302
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%—

Math GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116), Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Yi-Lightning
LMArena Math14271300

Knowledge Too close to call

GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179), Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Yi-Lightning
LMArena Expert14331286
Humanity's Last Exam8.3%—
Confabulations11.3%—

Multilingual GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77), Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Yi-Lightning
LMArena Non-English14171269
LMArena Chinese14651320
LMArena French14181305
LMArena German14071267
LMArena Japanese14151228
LMArena Korean13801192
LMArena Russian14141255
LMArena Spanish14541315

Instruction Following GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104), Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Yi-Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following14041278

Long Context Yi-Lightning leads

GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Yi-Lightning
LMArena Longer Query14121297
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127), Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Yi-Lightning
LMArena Text14301302
LMArena Creative Writing13951280
LMArena Multi-Turn14151311
Short-Story Creative Writing73.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1343—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5 better than Yi-Lightning?

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.5 or Yi-Lightning better for coding?

GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5 and Yi-Lightning share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper