Model comparison

GLM-4.5 vs MiMo-V2-Pro

GLM-4.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.0 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #122 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5 scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.5 leads 28.6 to 22.1.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.5.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • GLM-4.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-4.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro specifications
GLM-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Xiaomi
Noometry Index42.043.0
Released2025-07-272026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K1.05M
Max output98K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.60$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$2.20$0.87
Results tracked2723

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads

GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Coding14341476
ALE-Bench344.82785.17
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)54.2%—
LMArena WebDev—1433
WeirdML40.6%—
AlgoTune1.52—

Reasoning GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts14291457
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)—25.8%
Thematic Generalization—45.9%

Math Too close to call

GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Math14271447

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Expert14331478
Humanity's Last Exam8.3%—
Confabulations11.3%—

Multilingual Too close to call

GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Non-English14171416
LMArena Chinese14651456
LMArena French14181469
LMArena German14071417
LMArena Japanese14151366
LMArena Korean13801400
LMArena Russian14141427
LMArena Spanish14541457

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14041445

Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads

GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14121455
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—
CL-bench—15.7%
CL-bench Life—6.9%

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads

GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Text14301436
LMArena Creative Writing13951415
LMArena Multi-Turn14151456
Short-Story Creative Writing73.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1343—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

GLM-4.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.0 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5 or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.

Is GLM-4.5 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 41.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5 has 27 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper