Model comparison
GLM-4.5 vs Granite 4.0 H Small
GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.5 leads 52.8 to 38.6.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 42.0 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2025-07-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 98K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125), Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1434 | 1249 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 54.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 344.82 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.52 | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100), Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1429 | 1240 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | — |
Math GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1247 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
Knowledge GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179), Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1433 | 1251 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Confabulations | 11.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
Multilingual GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1414 | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1454 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1418 | — |
| LMArena German | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1380 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1222 |
| IFEval | — | 89% |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1412 | 1242 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127), Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1430 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1395 | 1211 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1415 | 1242 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1343 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5 better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5 or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?
GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5 and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.