Model comparison
GLM-4.5 vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.5 leads 53.0 to 43.5.
- GLM-4.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 39.0 |
| Released | 2025-07-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 98K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 41.1 (#121), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1434 | 1320 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 54.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 344.82 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.52 | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 27.7 (#99), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1430 | 1308 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | — |
Math GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 36.3 (#119), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1273 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.5: 35.5 (#172), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 11.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1433 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 53.0 (#74), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1414 | 1305 |
| LMArena French | 1423 | — |
| LMArena German | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1454 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 74.3 (#100), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1279 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#196), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | 1309 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 57.7 (#121), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1430 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1395 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1415 | 1303 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1343 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5 better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5 or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.1 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5 and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.