Model comparison

GLM-4.5 vs Hunyuan Large Vision

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #122 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.5 leads 52.8 to 39.9.
  • GLM-4.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-4.5 and Hunyuan Large Vision specifications
GLM-4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Tencent
Noometry Index42.037.6
Released2025-07-27—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output98K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.60—
Output $ / M tokens$2.20—
Results tracked2713

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding14341308
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)54.2%—
WeirdML40.6%—
ALE-Bench344.82—
AlgoTune1.52—

Reasoning GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts14291257
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%—

Math GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math14271268

Knowledge GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert14331252
Humanity's Last Exam8.3%—
Confabulations11.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-4.5: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision—1180

Multilingual GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English14171236
LMArena Chinese14651287
LMArena Russian14141243
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1407—
LMArena Japanese1415—
LMArena Korean1380—
LMArena Spanish1454—

Instruction Following GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following14041251

Long Context Too close to call

GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query14121280
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text14301263
LMArena Creative Writing13951248
LMArena Multi-Turn14151254
Short-Story Creative Writing73.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1343—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5 better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.5 or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5 and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper