Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

GLM-4.5-Air and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.9 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.9

Rank #177 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5-Air scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 43% for GLM-4.5-Air and 49.5% for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • GLM-4.5-Air is cheaper at $0.20 / $1.10 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

GLM-4.5-Air and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
GLM-4.5-AirQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.938.1
Released2025-07-202025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K262K
Max output98K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.20$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$1.10$7.50
Results tracked2725

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
GSO2.9%4.9%
LMArena Coding13971412
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-4.5-Air: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark43%49.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts13791372
ForecastBench59.2—

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math13961365
Omni-MATH39.1%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert13701338
Humanity's Last Exam8.1%—
MMLU-Pro76.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—

Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English13661346
LMArena Chinese14261357
LMArena French13991398
LMArena German13771325
LMArena Japanese13481310
LMArena Korean13081305
LMArena Russian13731366
LMArena Spanish13861360

Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13541355
IFEval81.2%—

Long Context Too close to call

GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13661378

Writing & Preference Too close to call

GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text13841357
LMArena Creative Writing13431333
LMArena Multi-Turn13711365
WildBench78.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5-Air better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

GLM-4.5-Air and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.9 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5-Air or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

GLM-4.5-Air is cheaper. It lists at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is GLM-4.5-Air or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5-Air and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5-Air has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper