Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.9

Rank #177 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5-Air scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 35.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Humanity's Last Exam: 8.1% for GLM-4.5-Air and 40.6% for Muse Spark.
  • GLM-4.5-Air has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-4.5-Air and Muse Spark specifications
GLM-4.5-AirMuse Spark
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Meta
Noometry Index38.950.6
Released2025-07-202026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output98K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$1.10—
Results tracked2727

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMuse Spark
LMArena Coding13971481
SciCode—51.5%
GSO2.9%—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMuse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts13791474
Kagi LLM Benchmark43%—
CritPt—11.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04
ForecastBench59.2—

Math Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMuse Spark
LMArena Math13961455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
Omni-MATH39.1%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMuse Spark
Humanity's Last Exam8.1%40.6%
LMArena Expert13701457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
MMLU-Pro76.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-4.5-Air: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English13661464
LMArena Chinese14261509
LMArena French13991497
LMArena German13771497
LMArena Korean13081459
LMArena Russian13731466
LMArena Spanish13861472
LMArena Japanese1348—

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following13541442
IFEval81.2%—

Long Context Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query13661451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMuse Spark
LMArena Text13841474
LMArena Creative Writing13431459
LMArena Multi-Turn13711477
WildBench78.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5-Air better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.5-Air or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5-Air and Muse Spark share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5-Air has 27 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper