Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.9

Rank #177 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5-Air scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 49.1 to 43.1.

Side by side

GLM-4.5-Air and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 specifications
GLM-4.5-AirLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)NVIDIA
Noometry Index38.936.7
Released2025-07-20—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output98K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$1.10—
Results tracked2711

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Coding13971312
GSO2.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-4.5-Air: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—10%

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Hard Prompts13791316
Kagi LLM Benchmark43%—
ForecastBench59.2—

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Math13961360
Omni-MATH39.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
Humanity's Last Exam8.1%—
MMLU-Pro76.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—
LMArena Expert1370—

Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Non-English13661282
LMArena Russian13731284
LMArena Chinese1426—
LMArena French1399—
LMArena German1377—
LMArena Japanese1348—
LMArena Korean1308—
LMArena Spanish1386—

Instruction Following Too close to call

GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Instruction Following13541308
IFEval81.2%—

Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Longer Query13661299

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Text13841320
LMArena Creative Writing13431314
LMArena Multi-Turn13711317
WildBench78.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5-Air better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.5-Air or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5-Air and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5-Air has 27 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper