Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 55.3 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1412 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1275 |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 461.45 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 7B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1372 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.5% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1365 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1338 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1346 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1357 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1398 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1366 |
| LMArena German | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1305 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1360 |
Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1355 |
Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1378 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1357 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1365 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.