Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Qwen2-72B
Gemma 7B and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2-72B in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2-72B leads 40.8 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Qwen2-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-06-07 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1196 |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 7B: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning Qwen2-72B leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | 125.28 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1171 |
| MMLU | 66.1% | 82.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Qwen2-72B leads
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1170 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1169 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1169 |
Instruction Following Qwen2-72B leads
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1181 |
Long Context Qwen2-72B leads
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1192 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2-72B leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1196 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen2-72B?
Gemma 7B and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 7B or Qwen2-72B better for coding?
Gemma 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.5 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen2-72B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.