Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Gemma 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 7B leads 27.1 to 23.8.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 999 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 976 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1026 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 980 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1024 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 952 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
| LMArena German | — | 902 |
Instruction Following Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 978 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 988 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 977 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Gemma 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?
Gemma 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.5 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.