Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Qwen Turbo
Gemma 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 7B leads 31.2 to 15.3.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen Turbo?
Gemma 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.