Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Qwen Max
Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Max leads 47.8 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 34.7 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen Max leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1269 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen Max leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Qwen Max leads
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1330 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1274 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Qwen Max leads
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1262 |
Long Context Qwen Max leads
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Qwen Max leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen Max?
Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or Qwen Max better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (30.5 vs 30.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen Max share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.