Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Phi-4 Mini
Gemma 7B and Phi-4 Mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSide by side
| Gemma 7B | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 30.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Phi-4 Mini?
Gemma 7B and Phi-4 Mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 7B or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Gemma 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.5 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.