Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
Gemma 7B and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 29.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 3 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 7B leads 19.9 to 14.8.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 29.3 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1101 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 20.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1100 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | 79.1% |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | 77% |
| WinoGrande | 79% | 81.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 30.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 24% |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
Math Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1151 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 17.6% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1067 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | 90.7% |
| MMLU | 66.1% | 75.7% |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | 88% |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | 58.1% |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
Multilingual Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1061 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1135 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1111 |
| LMArena German | — | 1080 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 966 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 894 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1111 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1087 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 47.2% |
Long Context Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1088 |
Writing & Preference Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1068 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 12.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?
Gemma 7B and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 29.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 7B or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?
Gemma 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.5 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.