Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Gemma 7B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 42.9 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Gemma 7B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 7B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Gemma 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.5 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.