Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs o1

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

o1 OpenAI

40.9

Rank #143 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1 leads 55.6 to 27.1.
  • Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 7B and o1 specifications
Gemma 7Bo1
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index30.040.9
Released2024-02-212024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$15
Output $ / M tokens—$60
Results tracked2752

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1 leads

Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), o1: 46.1 (#70)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo1
LMArena Coding10481367
HumanEval+28.7%89%
MBPP+43.4%80.2%
Aider Polyglot—61.7%
WeirdML—47.6%
LiveBench Coding—69.7%
CadEval—56%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo1
Cybench—10%
METR Time Horizons—51.1%

Reasoning o1 leads

Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), o1: 27.9 (#111)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo1
LMArena Hard Prompts10421371
Epoch Capabilities Index111.99141.91
SimpleBench—41.7%
ARC-AGI-1—30.7%
Chess Puzzles—15%
EnigmaEval—5.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—91.6%
DTBench—74.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis—65.5%
LMCA—22.3%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
HellaSwag82.2%—
LiveBench—75.7%
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math o1 leads

Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), o1: 36.1 (#175)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo1
LMArena Math10661388
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—14.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LiveBench Math—80.3%
MATH Level 5—94.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—9.3%
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge o1 leads

Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), o1: 41.5 (#110)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo1
LMArena Expert10011361
GPQA Diamond—76.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—8%
SimpleQA Verified—41.1%
Confabulations—11.7%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo1
LMArena Vision—1168
GeoBench—80%
VPCT—37%
SpatialViz-Bench—41.4%

Multilingual o1 leads

Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), o1: 48.6 (#142)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo1
LMArena Non-English9991358
LMArena Chinese10351394
LMArena French10251344
LMArena Russian9931356
LMArena German—1337
LMArena Japanese—1346
LMArena Korean—1396
LMArena Spanish—1345

Instruction Following o1 leads

Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), o1: 74.8 (#86)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo1
LMArena Instruction Following10171367
LiveBench Instruction Following—81.5%

Long Context o1 leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), o1: 50.3 (#9)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo1
LMArena Longer Query10221378
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%

Writing & Preference o1 leads

Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), o1: 55.6 (#144)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7Bo1
LMArena Text10561366
LMArena Creative Writing10241348
LMArena Multi-Turn9631369
Short-Story Creative Writing—70.2%
LiveBench Language—65.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than o1?

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or o1 better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and o1 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper