Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs o1
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1 leads 55.6 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 40.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), o1: 46.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1367 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | 89% |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | 80.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 7B: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning o1 leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), o1: 27.9 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1371 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | 141.91 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math o1 leads
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), o1: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge o1 leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), o1: 41.5 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1361 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 7B: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual o1 leads
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), o1: 48.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1394 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1356 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |
Instruction Following o1 leads
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), o1: 74.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
Long Context o1 leads
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), o1: 55.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1348 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1369 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than o1?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and o1 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.