Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs GPT-5.4 nano

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

GPT-5.4 nano OpenAI

41.9

Rank #125 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 nano in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.4 nano leads 55.7 to 27.1.
  • Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 7B and GPT-5.4 nano specifications
Gemma 7BGPT-5.4 nano
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index30.041.9
Released2024-02-212026-03-17
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$1.25
Results tracked2740

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), GPT-5.4 nano: 43.6 (#84)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Coding10481405
SciCode—46.9%
WeirdML—49.2%
ALE-Bench—1,005
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Reasoning GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), GPT-5.4 nano: 23.7 (#173)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Hard Prompts10421381
Epoch Capabilities Index111.99145.81
ARC-AGI-2—5.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—39.7%
ARC-AGI-1—51.5%
CritPt—9.3%
Chess Puzzles—30%
Mystery Game Puzzles—9%
DTBench—80.3%
LMCA—36.9%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
ForecastBench—57.3
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), GPT-5.4 nano: 40.9 (#88)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Math10661406
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—44.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—87.8%
ProofBench—5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—25.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—6.3%
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), GPT-5.4 nano: 41.9 (#103)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Expert10011396
GPQA Diamond—78.5%
SimpleQA Verified—11.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.1%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, GPT-5.4 nano: 36.7 (#78)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Vision—1196

Multilingual GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), GPT-5.4 nano: 48.6 (#140)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Non-English9991359
LMArena Chinese10351392
LMArena French10251396
LMArena Russian9931363
LMArena German—1367
LMArena Japanese—1343
LMArena Korean—1320
LMArena Spanish—1371

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), GPT-5.4 nano: 71.9 (#144)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Instruction Following10171362

Long Context GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#137)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Longer Query10221366

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), GPT-5.4 nano: 55.7 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Text10561372
LMArena Creative Writing10241314
LMArena Multi-Turn9631382

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than GPT-5.4 nano?

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or GPT-5.4 nano better for coding?

GPT-5.4 nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and GPT-5.4 nano share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 nano has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper