Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.4 leads 71.9 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | GPT-5.4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 59.4 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2026-03-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 68 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), GPT-5.4: 52.6 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1497 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.9% |
| DeepSWE | — | 51.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1465 |
| SciCode | — | 56.6% |
| GSO | — | 31.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 77.7% |
| MirrorCode | — | 15.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,607 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.85 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 7B: —, GPT-5.4: 46.5 (#13)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 81.8% |
| APEX-Agents | — | 52.4% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 39.4% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 35.1% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 19% |
| GBAEval | — | 45.1% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1197 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 74.3% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,144 |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), GPT-5.4: 61.8 (#19)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1485 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | 156.81 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 74% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 91.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 93.7% |
| CritPt | — | 23.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 44% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 16% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 80% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 25.4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 37% |
| DTBench | — | 94.4% |
| LMCA | — | 52% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.5 |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math GPT-5.4 leads
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), GPT-5.4: 73.5 (#19)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1488 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 78.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 49% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 83.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 97.8% |
| ProofBench | — | 56% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 47.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 27.1% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), GPT-5.4: 65.3 (#14)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1507 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 93.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 36.2% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 45.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 7B: —, GPT-5.4: 43.7 (#20)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1303 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 27.1% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 37.5% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1471 |
Multilingual GPT-5.4 leads
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), GPT-5.4: 56.2 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1519 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1493 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1480 |
| LMArena German | — | 1472 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1485 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1454 |
Instruction Following GPT-5.4 leads
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), GPT-5.4: 77.1 (#27)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1469 |
Long Context GPT-5.4 leads
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), GPT-5.4: 50.3 (#8)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1473 |
| CL-bench | — | 27.9% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 21.7% |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), GPT-5.4: 71.9 (#17)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1469 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1482 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1840 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1272 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than GPT-5.4?
GPT-5.4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or GPT-5.4 better for coding?
GPT-5.4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.6 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and GPT-5.4 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 has 68.