Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs GPT-5.1-Codex
GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.1-Codex leads 41.9 to 30.5.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | GPT-5.1-Codex | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2025-11-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.1-Codex leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.9 (#116)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 66% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,245 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 7B: —, GPT-5.1-Codex: 38.0 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 60.4% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 70.8% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), GPT-5.1-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), GPT-5.1-Codex: 30.3 (#235)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 9% |
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), GPT-5.1-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), GPT-5.1-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), GPT-5.1-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), GPT-5.1-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), GPT-5.1-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than GPT-5.1-Codex?
GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or GPT-5.1-Codex better for coding?
GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and GPT-5.1-Codex share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.1-Codex has 6.