Model comparison
Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen Plus
Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Plus in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 43.2 to 23.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 73.3% for Gemma 4 31B IT and 17.8% for Qwen Plus.
- Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper at $0.09 / $0.34 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Gemma 4 31B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.09 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.34 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1459 | 1328 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1366 | — |
| SciCode | 43.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 925.5 | — |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.5% | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1317 |
| DTBench | 82.7% | 81.1% |
| LMCA | 39.3% | 24% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 70.6% | — |
| CritPt | 1.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 53% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 30.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.74 | — |
Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.3% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1465 | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1465 | 1328 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 10.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1277 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1425 | — |
Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1431 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 1460 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1444 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1303 |
Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1446 | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1443 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | 1336 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1368 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1120 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Qwen Plus?
Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B IT or Qwen Plus?
Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.34 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.
Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Qwen Plus share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.