Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 54.0 to 35.0.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B IT and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Gemma 4 31B ITOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.232.2
Released2026-04-02—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.09—
Output $ / M tokens$0.34—
Results tracked3516

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.9 (#98), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14591210
LMArena WebDev1364—
SciCode43.4%—
WeirdML52.3%—
ALE-Bench925.5—

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 26.4 (#119), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14481208
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
Thematic Generalization53%—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74—

Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.3 (#72), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14641208
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#141), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1465—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.0 (#32), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision1278—
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 54.0 (#52), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14311160
LMArena Chinese14781192
LMArena Russian14621187
LMArena French1436—
LMArena Spanish1443—

Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.6 (#58), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14331186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#67), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14461194

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.7 (#92), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14431218
LMArena Creative Writing14161199
LMArena Multi-Turn14521221
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368—
WildBench—73.4%
EQ-Bench 41120—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper