Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.5

Rank #90 Confirmed

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

33.4

Rank #244 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 2 categories and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 27.2 to 22.4.
  • Gemma 4 31B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B IT and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview specifications
Gemma 4 31B ITNova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProviderGoogleAmazon
Noometry Index43.533.4
Released2026-04-022025-12-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.09—
Output $ / M tokens$0.34—
Results tracked353

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITNova 2.0 Pro Preview
SciCode43.4%42.7%
LMArena WebDev1366—
WeirdML52.3%—
LMArena Coding1459—
ALE-Bench925.5—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITNova 2.0 Pro Preview
GDP.pdf—2%

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITNova 2.0 Pro Preview
CritPt1.4%0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
Thematic Generalization53%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1448—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74—

Math Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITNova 2.0 Pro Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—
LMArena Math1465—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITNova 2.0 Pro Preview
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1465—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision1277—
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English1431—
LMArena Chinese1476—
LMArena French1435—
LMArena Russian1460—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Instruction Following1433—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Longer Query1446—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Text1443—
LMArena Creative Writing1415—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368—
EQ-Bench 41120—
LMArena Multi-Turn1452—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper