Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Granite 4.2 3b

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.2

Rank #85 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.0

Rank #163 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 4.2 3b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 60.7 to 47.9.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B IT and Granite 4.2 3b specifications
Gemma 4 31B ITGranite 4.2 3b
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index43.239.0
Released2026-04-02—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.09—
Output $ / M tokens$0.34—
Results tracked3511

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.9 (#98), Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Coding14591363
LMArena WebDev1364—
SciCode43.4%—
WeirdML52.3%—
ALE-Bench925.5—

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 26.4 (#119), Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Hard Prompts14481308
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
Thematic Generalization53%—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74—

Math Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.3 (#72), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 4.2 3b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—
LMArena Math1464—

Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#141), Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Expert14651313
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.0 (#32), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Vision1278—
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 54.0 (#52), Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Non-English14311268
LMArena Chinese14781268
LMArena Russian14621249
LMArena French1436—
LMArena Spanish1443—

Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.6 (#58), Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Instruction Following14331271

Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#67), Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Longer Query14461293

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.7 (#92), Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Text14431295
LMArena Creative Writing14161215
LMArena Multi-Turn14521293
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368—
EQ-Bench 41120—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Granite 4.2 3b?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Granite 4.2 3b better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Granite 4.2 3b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 3b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper