Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ring-2.6-1T
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has enough public results to be ranked (#88); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Google
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 0 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 25.3 to 21.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Ant Group (inclusionAI) | |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 36.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0765 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.26 | — |
| Results tracked | 28 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Ring-2.6-1T leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 40% | 42.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | 432.57 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1446 | — |
Reasoning Ring-2.6-1T leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205), Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1438 | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1469 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena French | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Ring-2.6-1T?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has enough public results to be ranked (#88); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 38.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Ring-2.6-1T share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.