Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.5

Rank #92 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

34.3

Rank #232 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Coder Next in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 40% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 32.3% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0675 / $0.23 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Qwen3 Coder Next specifications
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.534.3
Released2026-04-022026-02-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output33K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0675$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$0.23$0.80
Results tracked283

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3 Coder Next
SciCode40%32.3%
WeirdML35.2%34.4%
LMArena WebDev1359—
LMArena Coding1447—
ALE-Bench927.17—

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3 Coder Next
CritPt0%0%
Chess Puzzles6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1439—
DTBench74.9%—
LMCA29.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.85—

Math Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3 Coder Next
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202582.2%—
LMArena Math1470—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3 Coder Next
GPQA Diamond73.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
LMArena Expert1447—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Vision1260—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Non-English1421—
LMArena Chinese1495—
LMArena French1460—
LMArena Russian1434—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Instruction Following1420—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1434—
LMArena Creative Writing1402—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1305—
LMArena Multi-Turn1441—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0675 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper